Is the statement 'We are living in a post-truth world' true? If your answer is 'yes' then the answer is 'no' ...

Did I say, "We live in a world after the truth" ? If your answer is "yes" then the answer is "no" because the statement is based on the verdict and the evidence is still relevant and the information is still relevant ...
"Anyone who pushes universities to fulfill their mission of expanding knowledge, truth and rationality will face opposition because these are exactly the twentieth century. Aren't we living in a post-apocalyptic age? Conscious psychologists show that" people are fundamentally irrational. Not right? Is it acceptable to think recklessly and pursue the truth? Is it an information-based defense? "
The answer to all these questions is "no".

Steven Pinker: Why Don't We Live in a Post-Fact? Protection of (unnecessary) factors and (important) role of universities in their development

[Together with Stephen Hick's hat]

Content is reproduced using PC.BlogSpot.Com © links and copyright features.